|
NATIONAL DESK |
Another Art Battle, as Detroit Museum Closes an Exhibit Early

|
By ROBYN MEREDITH (New
York Times)
November 23, 1999
Visitors to the
Detroit Institute of Arts, the grande dame of museums here, could visit a
room in the modern gallery to see a toy Jesus wearing a condom, a pile of
human excrement and a brazil nut labeled with a racial epithet. For two
days.
But the
one-room exhibition, containing 15 provocative pieces, was shuttered on
Friday after its brief run because of concerns that it would offend the
community, and the local artist whose work now stands behind closed doors
has accused the museum of censorship.
The
museum's director disagrees. ''The museum is always selecting works of art,
and
selection is not censorship,'' said Graham W. J. Beal, who joined the museum
two months ago. ''Asking an artist to exclude one work in favor of another
is not censorship.''
The
artist saw it differently. ''It would be like if I painted a picture of a
nude and they said, 'It might offend some people; why don't you paint a
dress on it,' '' said Jef J. Bourgeau, who runs a nonprofit museum in nearby
Pontiac, Mich. ''It is push-your-button art, it is aggressive art, but it is
art.''
But Mr.
Beal saw it more as a question of choosing his battles.
''We have
to be the ones comfortable with the
position we are taking, and not just say, well, the artist demands it so we
are going to put it in the show,'' said Mr. Beal, who likened the situation
to that of an exhibition at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, ''Sensation,'' that
Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani recently tried unsuccessfully to shut down. ''The
museum and art become a political and moral football kicked around by all
sorts of people,'' Mr. Beal said.
The
American Civil Liberties Union has criticized the decision to close the
exhibition, called ''Van Gogh's Ear,'' which opened Wednesday and was to
have run through Sunday.
''The
essence of modern art in general is to allow people to make up their own
mind about art,'' said Kary L. Moss, executive director of the Michigan
branch of the A.C.L.U.
Mr.
Bourgeau's exhibition was commissioned two years ago, and he had worked with
a museum curator in planning it. But the new museum director had not been
aware of what the exhibition would contain before it opened, said a museum
spokeswoman, Annmarie Erickson.
It was
meant to explore how artists are intertwined with the art they create,
particularly in the context of artists who had gained notoriety in the
1990's, Mr. Bourgeau said.
One item
on display is a jar of urine, labeled as that used in Andres Serrano's
photograph of a submerged cross. ''It was supposed to be the actual urine
used, but it wasn't,'' Mr. Bourgeau said.
Similarly, there is a video that purports to be the work of British artist
Tracey Emin, showing her taking a shower while menstruating. But another
naked woman is on the screen. And the Jesus with a condom is attributed to
Chris Ofili, the artist whose ''Holy Virgin Mary'' painting is adorned with
elephant dung at the Brooklyn museum. Despite the label, it is meant to be
taken as the pretend response of Mr. Ofili to the controversy created by his
work.
''Some
people understand and some people don't,'' Mr. Bourgeau said. And so in a
post-modern spectacle of its own, art pretending to be that of controversial
artists of the past has become controversial itself.

Mr. Beal,
who said he turned down the ''Sensation'' exhibit while director of the Los
Angeles County Museum of Art, said that it was sometimes appropriate for
museums to show art likely to offend, but that it was not warranted in this
case.
''They
were afraid somebody might be offended -- nobody ever was,'' said Mr.
Bourgeau, who added few people had seen the exhibit. ''The show was closed
and censored from the inside, which is a new and disturbing twist for the
art world. Ten years ago the director of the Corcoron was fired for
canceling the Mapplethorpe show before it ever arrived. Now, we laud a
museum director for shutting down a show in its first week. Maybe, in a sad
way, this is the history of the 90’s artworld playing out. In the midst of
it all, we've got this huge controversy over work no one's ever seen.''
 |